Prediction of Elise Mertens [29th] vs Mirjam Bjorklund [551st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W L W
Form
L L W L L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Mertens 1 - 1 Bjorklund
They have played 6 sets in total, with Mertens winning 3 and Bjorklund winning 3. The last match between Mertens and Bjorklund was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2023, First, Hard with Elise Mertens getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 1 |
| Mirjam Bjorklund | 1 |
| Mertens | Stats | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (17-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 29 | Ranking | 551 |
| 12 | Highest Rank | 123 |
| 29 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 20 | Titles | 10 |
| 63% (463-268) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-146) |
| $9,094,391 | Career Prize Money | $508,748 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
19
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 32 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 31 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:58:40 | Average Match Time | 2:58:40 |
| 52% (97/186) | 1st Serve % | 66% (172/260) |
| 69% (67/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (108/172) |
| 38% (34/89) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (37/88) |
| 33% (9/27) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
| 44% (115/260) | Return Points Win % | 46% (85/186) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elise Mertens vs Mirjam Bjorklund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mertens 1 - 1 Bjorklund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mertens has won 40.77% of points on their second serve, while Bjorklund has won 38.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mertens, in recent form, has won 49.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjorklund has won 52.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.78% and 34.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mertens has saved 50.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorklund has saved 41.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mertens has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Bjorklund winning 36.84% (W/L 7/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mertens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 272/ 142), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 34/ 31). Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 128/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Mertens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9), where as Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 4/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mertens winning 1 times and Bjorklund being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Mertens winning 3 and Bjorklund winning 3. The last match between Mertens and Bjorklund was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2023, First, Hard with Elise Mertens getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:58:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mertens and Bjorklund have played a deciding set 2 times, with Mertens winning 1 times and Bjorklund 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Mertens winning 1, and Bjorklund 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mertens has played against opponents with an average rank of 119.33 while Bjorklund has played against players with an average rank of 181.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mertens has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorklund has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mertens has converted 31.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorklund has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Elise Mertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Varvara Gracheva
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elise Mertens
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Peyton Stearns
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
76 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
123)
5
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
9
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
33%
(
17 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
54 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-2 6-7(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elise Mertens
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Elise Mertens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mertens vs Bjorklund?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mertens Vs Bjorklund is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (463/268) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/146) |
| 61% (1016/656) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (487/339) |
| 55% (8330/6767) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4027/3382) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1845 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2564 | Total Double Faults | 596 |
| 1:17:16 | Average Match Time | 1:28:15 |
| 120.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 232.13 |
| 59% (22298/37759) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14263/21857) |
| 66% (14768/22298) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8662/14263) |
| 45% (6974/15452) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3562/7594) |
| 48% (2421/5056) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1460/3080) |
| 46% (18029/39020) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10573/22321) |
| 63% (455/719) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (215/355) |
| 63% (5/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (63/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (34/64) |
| 56% (115/207) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 88% (461/407) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (223/195) |
| 11% (461/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (223/27) |
| 20% (270/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (142/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
